The people who work there are volunteers. I talked to an older woman and an older man. They were both very sweet and gave me a card for visiting their Church, and where it was located.
The Christian Science reading room is a great resource for a lot of information in regards to information about the Faith and the Christian Science Monitor, which is actually a magazine of pretty good quality. The other magazine called The Christian Science Sentinel on the other hand...not so much. The miracle faith healings don't seem to be that much of miracles and are not based in science. Someone felt pain on a certain part of their body...and it went away, it seems like time and focus could have easily healed it then divine intervention (especially when compared to the miracles in the Bible proper). The high mortality rate among Christian Scientists also doesn't give me much credence to it actually working. Of course there is always the possibility it does. Here is a good article on them and their rejection of modern medicine:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/24/nyregion/24heal.html
What made me most uncomfortable about the reading though was it's focus on
This is something I've noticed with a lot of new movements in regards to Christianity though. Mormonism at times is more about Joseph Smith then Jesus, Mars Hill is all about what Mark Driscoll says about the Bible, just like Christian Science is about
It's this I think that turns me away from me any religion as well, and why I tend to find more connection with my friends who are followers of the faiths, then many of the leaders (with the exception of smaller more local leaders). Because of a religion becoming more about the founder of the sect or current leader, what then becomes the question is: Are people just reinventing God in their own image?
What's wrong with Christian Science or Mormonism having scritures and prophets of their own? You could make the same argument about Christianity: It is less about the Old testament proper and more about Jesus and what he revealed...
ReplyDeleteI've always felt it should be ideas rather then people that are the essence of religion (including Mormonism, Christian Science, and others). It's ideas that change people and ideas that make up philosophy, not the creators of the ideas.
ReplyDeleteMark Twain wrote a book on Christian Science. I hear it is a good read.
ReplyDeleteI'll have to check out his book. I'm curious now.
ReplyDelete